THE FELTENING – Ethan Ralph vs. Kino Casino (Guntpocalypse Clip)
News

THE FELTENING – Ethan Ralph vs. Kino Casino (Guntpocalypse Clip)



A few months ago, Ethan Ralph’s life was on a downward spiral. But then it went into an outright tailspin when he picked a fight with his former co-host Andy Warski. Andy, who had just started a new demonstrate called Kino Casino (with his co-host, People’s Populist Press, or “PPP”) responded with a nearly 6-hour mega demonstrate called the “F Ralph Festival.” The demonstrate was very successful. And and PPP made a ton of money, while Ralph, in his impotent age, flew out to Portugal and got is face broken.

This video is a small segment from the forthcoming “Ballad of Ethan Ralph: Guntpocalypse.” The full video is gonna take a little while, so there will likely be a few to a greater extent than of these small segments along the way.

For those who don’t know, Ethan Ralph is a convicted sexual offender, and a rapist who ruins his life for the enjoyment of others.

Andy Wasrki and PPP’s demonstrate, “Kino Casino,” can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/user/C0mm1ssar

*******

annotation: Cancerless Jim is a FICTIONAL animated cartoon character. The views he expresses are non those of James Patrick O’Shaughnessy, or of Kill All Pedos. This video is intended strictly for COMEDIC or SATIRICAL purposes, and is non intended to threaten or harass anyone. regard Elonis v. United States, 575 U.S. ___ (2015); United States v. Bagdasarian, 652 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2011) (a “true threat” must have objectively threatening language and include a subjective intent to intimidate); United States v. Doggart, 906 F.3d 506, 510 (6th Cir. 2018) (“an expression of an intent to inflict loss or harm”); United States v. White, 810 F.3d 212, 220 (4th Cir. 2016) (“serious expression of an intent to do harm”); United States v. Heineman, 767 F.3d 970, 972 (10th Cir. 2014) (“declaration of intention, purpose, design, goal, or determination to inflict [bodily injury] on another”). Rather, this video is an example of edgy or offensive humor, similar to South commons, Family Guy, Boondocks, etc. The creators of this video are non affiliated with any political movements or groups. The creators of this video do non endorse any particular course of action, ESPECIALLY non VIOLENCE.

Moreover, the speech expressed in this video is protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and may non be used as a predicate for any government action against its creators, or Mr. O’Shaughnessy himself. regard U.S. Const. amend. I; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; Fogel v. Collins, 531 F.3d 824, 832 (9th Cir. 2008); Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705, 706-708 (1969). “Understood in its full context, no reasonable somebody” would believe this crudely animated cartoon constitutes “a true threat of serious harm.” Fogel, 531 F.3d at 832. Government agents who target citizens on the basis of “an manifestly satiric or hyperbolic political message” are subject to civil liability. Id. at 832. All government agents viewing this material are hereby on notice that it is COMEDIC, SATIRICAL, and entirely FICTIONAL.

Lastly, all of the content in this video falls comfortably within legal definition of “fair use.” regard 17 U.S.C § 107; Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994); Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1998); Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013).

ENJOY!